Leave a legacy.

free voicemail with or without credit

By: lawarcbur79 | 31-07-2014 10:14

i think we should receive our voicemails free with or without credit as long as you have topped up in the last 3 months, there is nothing more frustrating than missing a call and you have used up all your mins, i think this could give giffgaff another edge again in the market.

Comments

by: pk2017
on: 16-06-2020 04:18

this would be amazing ?

by: poiuytrewqasdfghjkl
on: 07-06-2020 12:54

i agree 100% if they don't lat us listen when we don't have credit why are they letting people leave a voice message???

by: jesi23
on: 07-06-2020 14:10

If you want to disable voicemail, it is up to you. You have control on your settings; you can always set your voicemail message to request people to send you a SMS if you are unable to retrieve your voicemail (dialling 443); if you have ANY Goodybag, your unlimited UK minutes allow you to retrieve your voicemails!

by: foxydidi
on: 28-05-2020 13:40

Can;t wait for that!

by: vkkifarrell
on: 26-05-2020 17:54

its a great idea, i dont like calling a voicemail when i get charged for it and often miss important messages

by: jesi23
on: 26-05-2020 20:29

Vkkifarrell, if you have a Goodybag, you are not charged for accessing Voicemail by dialling 443 - it is included in your Goodybag.

if you have just PAYG with giffgaff, you are charged 8p for accessing Voicemail, no matter how many messages are waiting for you. This is a flat rate, not a ‘per minute’ rate

by: paint12096
on: 12-05-2020 07:39

yes I agree voicemail is a necessity

by: jesi23
on: 13-05-2020 09:08

Do you mean that FREE voicemail is a necessity? I don’t often use voicemail, either to communicate or to receive messages, but I got used to NOT using voicemail since sending a text can give more clarity, and Orange used to charge per minute for retrieval (using your credit quickly). Although giffgaff are cheaper (either charging 8p/one-Goodybag-minute per access to all voicemails available) old habits die hard.

by: iva1917
on: 07-05-2020 16:06

Absolutely brilliant id

by: ukrun
on: 06-05-2020 14:25

Fantastic idea

by: matt261103
on: 03-05-2020 14:05

Why "not for us"?!

by: matt261103
on: 03-05-2020 14:05

Why "not for us"?!

by: bertiebat
on: 05-07-2020 21:09

Probably because it potentially could be abused as someone has identified in the comments. However I agree that an explanation should have been given (could even have an explanation which is now lost in the comments).

by: morga04620
on: 20-04-2020 00:12

love a bargain